About Me

Nottingham, United Kingdom
Currently studying in the University of Nottingham, England.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Say No to the Spectre of May 13

Im writing to give my thoughts to the lattest hot issue going around back home:
The statement by PJ Utara MP Chew Mei Fun(MCA) thatIf there is insufficient Chinese representation in the Barisan Nasional, it is not a good thing, the Chinese community cannot afford another May 13 incident.”

This statement was aired by China Press. Obviously I cant and dont read the China Press, this is just news gathered around from the blogs. This statement has caused an uproar by civil society groups because of the highly threatening nature of this statment. Anyone with half a brain cell will be able to tell the meaning behind this statement:- That if chinese dont vote MCA, we will have another 13 May incident.

Now, China Press has aired an apology stating that the reporter had "misquoted and misrepresented Ms. Chew" in their coverage of the event. They state that Chew actualy said “If we do not have enough representation in the Barisan Nasional, then to the Chinese community, the lesson of 1969 is sufficient. I think we cannot afford another such scenario.”

Now of course these are all translations, so there are bound to be inaccuracies. (I figure her speech was in mandarin, and CP is in mandarin).

If this is true, and the translation accurate, I feel abit sorry for the MP because of the storm that is now hitting her. However, She didn't deny it (to my knowledge), and anyway what did she mean by 'the lesson of 1969 is sufficient' (or insufficient??). Some people claim that what she meant was actualy the shamefully huge loss MCA suffered in 1969 (and UMNO too for the matter). But of course what did that end up with? 13 May of course! So the way I see it, it is no different (IMHO) from the previous statement, except that this is what she may have actualy said, whilst the reporter might have just written down what she meant.

Either way, I feel as an MP it was highly irresponsible to make such a statement(whichever it was). The fact is, you say 1969 the first thing that comes to mind is 13 May. And anyway, UMNO has been calling out the 13 May Bogeyman for sometime now right? So why not MCA? BN Buddies! LOL.

The fact is that making such statements are realy playing with fire, and until she comes out with an explanation as to what she 'actually' meant by her statement (if that isnt what she meant) people can, will, and should see it as a dangerous and threatening gesture.

Hence, several civil society groups(Bersih Included) have come out with a joint statement, and many other individuals have endorsed it. All who agree with it can put it up on their blog. I have reproduced the statement blow, for you to see(and to keep yourselves informed!).

My POV? I will endorse this statement untill an apology, explanation, and statement that all should not fear their safety when voting is issued by MP Chew. These are of course just my thoughts, and I would very much like to hear your view on the matter.

~Baron Out~

JOINT PRESS STATEMENT BY CONCERNED MALAYSIANS ON 22 JANUARY 2008:

We, the undersigned civil society groups and concerned citizens of diverse ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds, stress that all Malaysians have the right to choose their representatives and the government in a free, fair and clean election. No individual politician or political party should resort to threats or intimidation to influence the voter’s decision.
We lament that Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun, MCA MP for Petaling Jaya Utara, as reported in the China Press on January 21 (Monday), has conveyed this fear-mongering message to the public: “If there is insufficient Chinese representation in the Barisan Nasional, it is not a good thing, the Chinese community cannot afford another May 13 incident.”

The May 13 ethnic riot in 1969 was a dark chapter in Malaysia’s political history where political violence and manipulation overshadowed the democratic process as well as the voice of the people. Invoking the bitter memories of this tragic incident for political gain is a huge insult to those who died, the surviving victims and their families. This veiled threat to voters not to support the opposition parties is shameless and unbecoming of a responsible political leader.

If Chew is aware of certain quarters planning to use violence in response to a certain electoral outcome, she who has been speaking tirelessly on public safety should lodge a police report immediately and assist in the police investigation.

If she is merely speculating, we are truly disappointed that she has stooped so low in fishing for support. Politicians should not behave like gangsters. They should not use the threat of violence to solicit vote, as gangsters do to extort money.

By making this statement, Chew has in fact violated Section 9 (1) of the Election Offences Act 1954:
Undue influence9. (1) Every person who, before, during or after an election, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person on his behalf, makes use of or threatens to make use of any force, violence, or restraint, or inflicts or threatens to inflict, by himself or by any other person, any temporal or spiritual injury, damage, harm, or loss upon or against any person in order to induce or compel such person to vote or refrain from voting, or on account of such person having voted or refrained from voting, at any election, or who by abduction, duress, or any fraudulent device or contrivance impedes or prevents the free exercise of the franchise of any elector or voter, or thereby compels, induces, or prevails upon any elector or voter either to give or refrain from giving his vote at any election, or who directly or indirectly interferes or attempts to interfere with the free exercise by any person of any electoral right shall be guilty of the offence of undue influence.

While waiting for the Election Commission to investigate and lodge a police report, we call upon Chew to do the honorable thing. She should retract her statement and apologize unreservedly for her fear-mongering act. She must condemn unreservedly the use of political violence in Malaysia.

Voters must be assured of their right to vote for any candidate or party of their choice in an environment that is free from fear and intimidation.

We also call upon the Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Badawi to disassociate his administration and party from Chew’s fear-mongering statement and condemn unreservedly the use of threats and intimidation on voters.

We must not let Malaysia become a failed state where political violence rules, like Pakistan. We must not allow any party to ‘play with fire’. We categorically reject anyone who uses the spectre of May 13 as a bogeyman to threaten Malaysians.

All individuals or civil society organisations in support of democracy may endorse this statement by displaying a copy of this statement on their premises, vehicles or the front page of their blogs or websites, until Chew retract the statement and apologizes.

Civil Society Organisations:
Coalition For Clean and Fair Elections (BERSIH)
Group of Concerned Citizens (GCC)
Writers Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI)
Malaysian Voters Union (MALVU)
Save Ourselves (SOS Penang)
PJ Utara Get an MP Initiative

No comments: